Skip to main content

Table 4 Summary of imaging results across the 2 groups of ataxic patients (MSA-C, SAOA) and healthy control subjects. One-way ANOVA did not demonstrate a significant difference in Cho/Cr from the hemisphere, so post hoc testing was not preformed

From: Is 1H-MR spectroscopy useful as a diagnostic aid in MSA-C?

 

MSA-C

SAOA

MSA-C vs SAOA

Controls

MSA-C compared to controls

Mean

SD

Mean

SD

P-value

Mean

SD

P-value

Vermis NAA/Cr

0.67

0.12

0.82

.16

P = 0.003‡

0.99

0.10

P < 0.001+‡

Vermis Cho/Cr

0.62

0.25

0.76

.18

P > 0.05

0.80

0.08

P = 0.040+

Hemisphere NAA/Cr

0.72

0.25

0.97

.20

P = 0.001‡

1.01

0.09

P < 0.001+‡

Hemisphere Cho/Cr

0.70

0.21

0.82

.22

P > 0.05

0.78

0.12

P > 0.05

Brainstem volume (% of TICV)

0.72

0.22

1.16

.18

P < 0.001‡

1.25

0.19

P < 0.001+‡

Cerebellum volume (% of TICV)

5.64

0.60

4.97

1.12

P > 0.05

7.53

1.15

P < 0.001+‡

Brainstem volume (cm3)

10.86

3.33

17.02

2.49

P < 0.001+‡

18.95

2.64

P < 0.001+‡

Cerebellum volume (cm3)

82.17

8.16

72.87

16.29

P = 0.078+

115.28

15.14

P < 0.001

  1. +ANOVA with Tukey’s HSD post hoc
  2. ‡remain statistically significant after Bonferoni correction