Table 1 Analysis of variance of sway measures
From: Dual task effect on postural control in patients with degenerative cerebellar disorders
Parameter | Effect | degrees of freedom, f-value | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|
Sway area | Dual task effect | F(1;26) = 24.197 | <0.001 |
Dual Task effect*group | F(1;26) = 0.028 | 0.868 | |
Condition | F(1.42;36.932) = 70.9 | <0.001 | |
Condition*group | F(1.42;36.932) = 7.46 | 0.005 | |
Dual task effect*condition | F(2.547;66.232) = 1.559 | 0.213 | |
Dual task effect* condition*group | F(2.547;66.232) = 0.618 | 0.580 | |
Group | F(1;26) = 11.192 | 0.002 | |
Sway path | Dual task effect | F(1;26) = 49.173 | <0.001 |
Dual task effect*group | F(1;26) = 0.569 | 0.457 | |
Condition | F(2.219;57.69) = 72.382 | <0.001 | |
Condition*group | F(2.219;57.69) = 0.649 | 0.542 | |
Dual task effect*condition | F(3.27;85.033) = 2.382 | 0.070 | |
Dual task effect* condition*group | F(3.27;85.033) = 4.127 | 0.007 | |
Group | F(1;26) = 3.958 | 0.057 | |
Anteroposterior sway | Dual task effect | F(1;26) = 16.024 | <0.001 |
Dual task effect*group | F(1;26) = 0.09 | 0.926 | |
Condition | F(2.6;67.59) = 52.9 | < 0.001 | |
Condition*group | F(2.6;67.59) = 3.242 | 0.033 | |
Dual task effect*condition | F(5;130) = 1.471 | 0.204 | |
Dual task effect* condition*group | F(5;130) = 0.647 | 0.664 | |
Group | F(1;26) = 15.704 | 0.001 | |
Mediolateral sway | Dual task effect | F(1;26) = 11.925 | 0.002 |
Dual task effect*group | F(1;26) = 0.715 | 0.406 | |
Condition | F(2.113;54.954) = 125.941 | < 0.001 | |
Condition*group | F(2.113;54.945) = 1.341 | 0.271 | |
Dual task effect*condition | F(3.124;81.233) = 2.82 | 0.042 | |
Dual task effect* condition*group | F(3.124;81.233) = 1.908 | 0.132 | |
Group | F(1;26) = 3.953 | 0.057 |